Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, together with case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
A reduce court may well not rule against a binding precedent, whether or not it feels that it is unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the law evolve, it could both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of the cases; some jurisdictions allow for your judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the realized counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession from the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Normally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which include All those in crystal clear violation of proven case legislation) towards the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case is not appealed, the decision will stand.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Plainly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion requires a shift to your higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, around the other hand, delivers financial relief by inserting an employee inside a higher pay back scale, without changing their work duties or position. It's a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same pay scale for an extended time, particularly when they lack prospects for promotion. Upgradation can be a policy Resource used to ease the hardship of prolonged-term stagnation. Read more
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past check here decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden given to any reported judgment could count on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[7]
Several judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name over the ECL based over the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Therefore, this petition must be allowed Read more
The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report on the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of the police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, ensure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair into the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the regulation laid down because of the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. As a result, the competent authority in the parent department on the petitioner along with the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent is likewise directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
ten. Based on the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition is not really viewed as maintainable and is also therefore liable to be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the realized counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession from the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are founded by executive agencies based on statutes.